Skip to content

Update 2 NuGet dependencies #27

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 26, 2025
Merged

Update 2 NuGet dependencies #27

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 26, 2025

Conversation

@nfbot
Copy link
Member

@nfbot nfbot commented Feb 25, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Bumps nanoFramework.CoreLibrary from 1.16.11 to 1.17.1
Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.67 to 3.0.68

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated internal core libraries to the latest stable releases.
    • Upgraded the testing framework dependencies to ensure improved compatibility and reliability.

These dependency updates help maintain overall system stability, which translates into a smoother and more consistent user experience.

@nfbot
Update 2 NuGet dependencies
c4d7cce 
Bumps nanoFramework.CoreLibrary from 1.16.11 to 1.17.1</br>Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.67 to 3.0.68</br>
[version update]

### ⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 25, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

This pull request updates dependency versions in two package lock files. In both files, the nanoFramework.CoreLibrary dependency is upgraded from version 1.16.11 to 1.17.1, with corresponding changes to the requested, resolved, and contentHash fields. Additionally, in the Tests/SerializationTests/packages.lock.json file, the nanoFramework.TestFramework dependency is updated from version 3.0.67 to 3.0.68.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
Tests/SerializationTests/packages.lock.json, nanoFramework.../packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.CoreLibrary dependency from 1.16.11 to 1.17.1; modified requested, resolved, and contentHash fields.
Tests/SerializationTests/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.TestFramework dependency from 3.0.67 to 3.0.68; modified requested, resolved, and contentHash fields.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update 1 NuGet dependencies #26: Updates only the nanoFramework.TestFramework dependency, providing a code-level connection in the context of dependency version modifications.
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 919e0e0 and c500805.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)
  • Tests/SerializationTests/SerializationTests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/SerializationTests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.System.Runtime.Serialization.nuspec is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.System.Runtime.Serialization/System.Runtime.Serialization.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.System.Runtime.Serialization/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Tests/SerializationTests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
  • nanoFramework.System.Runtime.Serialization/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • Tests/SerializationTests/packages.lock.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
nanoFramework.System.Runtime.Serialization/packages.lock.json (1)

7-9: Dependency Update: nanoFramework.CoreLibrary Version Upgrade

The changes correctly update the dependency for nanoFramework.CoreLibrary from version 1.16.11 to 1.17.1 by modifying the "requested", "resolved", and "contentHash" fields. Please ensure that the new content hash corresponds to the expected package content for version 1.17.1. Additionally, verify that this dependency change does not introduce any breaking changes in the runtime.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 26, 2025

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@nfbot nfbot merged commit 2174ee9 into main Feb 26, 2025
6 checks passed
@nfbot nfbot deleted the nfbot/update-dependencies/8e784c54-21e0-4a4d-9a60-a6fc57fe4994 branch February 26, 2025 10:42
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

CI: Publish Release Type: dependencies

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@nfbot @josesimoes